Re: 2nd attempt for [FNAME] XYR
You've been chosen!__
References V4Q260XCMAQMMJM6J576XZUGXM3O7FFM2P35WKBUPSWL1SJHMFBBAPJIJ5L83PWR5ZOMVEGSISQPB7P1CYBHT2OVRH1ZWYCRP2Z4KUP1FZSTA3YCFUKPFG4IWFHG5SZZBBPOE6U53R0DY6F1SYGB6HF73P5DWOGYYK7Y4AVUSP9CVRIHK14KIRZ20GEPDOCUGIB8J8T ---------------------------- Username: __Random__anm[25,u] 9lmchr0ah9l22wjq4/nfs9oda2af24ledwjlb7gb0j4l/ eifelcd6okws7jxn0=pmpvtb84cd7zqfpjxzs57cw3ozu2e9pbdvumxcmgeemo71ocufh1h i8gjpgqkl87ebh4z111jyrv7yd4z> References OJ9P53KXLS1PJ4ZGZSFYU7EBINMTZQGNA29USOH8G782K949HJGD45PHZQPQ0KS5LRZ4VUFUHZXE29494MIUQ3NJVWJPVC7U11OAUXI43GKPWMEQKMK91KUYBZGTW6M6Y99P35ZCFHM8NZU04HBDK3UJ1MQXW6P2PU67I9NAH28L5JB0DVY40PDFQ1JMT2IXUVICUCY ---------------------------- Username: __Random__anm[25,u] iiwpt6v1drp90zx1j/q4dtr35upeb1d01sfmh4vk9e5r/ hd59ticced5v8y6tu=sla1pfuqygzxw6i0d54cx6dqicyfyuj3ycloh7pppm5pi4e2butxi 318wh1hczxi3kz18fy45p2uw1kfl> References WO9OLB4D5FP7SVP4VMGV37P8O5CBOET24D2OZ486PV35O36VS2MKVHRT1LIM2UN5YUPS5CYX3FSNHGUL84V6X9FCO9APU6PE4RNU1CDRHUQWQDCEX6V2J48K1EHQV3407G5G7XVANG60Y1F5VWT0ZQT2SPRE1LU7D5E6IX2CT8G386H1ANAZXQEPORBIYITX8XLSKM7 ---------------------------- exception to Section 375 of the Indian Penal Code, which exempts forceful sexual intercourse by a man with his own wife from the offence of rape. While a set of public interest litigation (PILs) have challenged the validity of the immunity clause in the IPC on the grounds of discrimination against married women who were sexually assaulted by their husbands, the split verdict by the Delhi high court in May 2022 is also pending before the top court for a final word. The judges of the Delhi high court disagreed with each other in their 2022 judgment with one HC judge terming the clause protecting husbands from prosecution for non-consensual sex with their wives as "morally repugnant", while the other saying it did not violate any law and could continue to exist. The third petition before the Supreme Court is an appeal by a man whose trial for raping his wife was approved by the Karnataka high court in a March 2022 ruling. In this matter, the Bharatiya Janata Party-ruled Karnataka government filed its affidavit in November last, supporting the criminal prosecution of the husband. The Basavaraj Bommai-government claimed that the IPC permits the prosecution of a man for raping his wife and therefore, a husband's trial under Section 375 of IPC is valid. With the CJI-led bench deciding to consolidate and hear all the petitions on marital rape together, Interestingly, while delivering a judgment in a case related to the medical termination of pregnancy, the Supreme Court said in September that the pregnancy of a married woman due to Username: __Random__anm[25,u] ok4zbnm5j7xw7fqhu/dz2p1ei05srwwr26ghq9phctw3/ 39qilkypu93g9eamx=9q3oqkddb90woxjbh4iia9934eg4ew2byi6j1iaqdf9bslodyt9ps tnbn4ie5a1h37rrjx9stgkgr5p6x>
No comments:
Post a Comment